In the justice of open opinion, John Higgins right away has a outrageous subject symbol subsequent to his reputation. In effect, the News of the World branded him a match-fixer. The inform pronounced he had "sensationally" concluded a "massive" cheat to "FIX matches" (NoWs capitals).
Inside the paper, Higgins does assumingly determine to lose 4 frames, one support at each of 4 events, at an undisclosed point in the future. But the paper does not indicate Higgins has ever essentially bound a compare or thrown a support in his 18-year career. Nor does it contend when he would. And that is one reason because available the result of an review is to be suggested prior to combining an perspective on his shame or innocence.
This is not to contend that Higgins, and generally his manager, Pat Mooney, were not genuine at best, and presumably stupid, to put themselves in a on all sides where they are deliberating throwing frames for cash. That Mooney met reporters multiform times and talked about regulating is disturbing. He was right to renounce from snookers ruling body, and his poise raises grave doubts over his bearing as Higginss manager.
But there are drift to think Higgins fell chase to an elaborate, costly NoW set-up. If specifics were agreed, zero of those sum done it in to imitation or in to the edited video that the paper put on the website. The paper describes Higgins as "demanding a �300,000 kickback", nonetheless zero in the inform substantiates Higgins "demanding" anything.
A NoW contributor suggests the "fixing" would occur usually in "exhibition matches". Losing a support in an muster where pretence shots and stand-up humerous entertainment from players whilst behaving are usual is an wholly opposite tender to losing one at a tournament.
| _______________________ |
No comments:
Post a Comment